![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,049
| Does anyone know?
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member
Contests: Joint 3nd place overall winner 2010
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,674
|
I can only assume it's so there will be no need for a cut. It's easier,perhaps,to get golfers to travel half-way around the globe if they know they'll avoid the ignominy of an early exit... Pax Vobiscum Saint-Just X |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,049
| Originally Posted by Saint-Just X
On the PGA TOUR, World Golf Championship stroke events are no cut events of 80 players, so why not 80 players in the Olympics instead of 60?
Ps: I think I know why there is a 60 player limit for each gender but I want someone from the PGA TOUR to verify it, so I'll let you know if I get an answer.
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 Last edited by gxer; 10-09-2009 at 01:05 PM. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,380
|
I see Tiger is thrilled golf is to be included in 2016 and says he'll play. I guess that shows us he's proposing playing until then at least, and intends being right up there.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,049
|
Here's the answer I got from the PGA TOUR to the question, why 60 for the field size in the Olympics. "It was a blend of providing the highest-ranked field possible while ensuring we kept the total number of golfers as small as possible."
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Contest Statistician Join Date: May 2006 Location: NYC
Posts: 3,902
|
Sounds like a good number. Not too big and not too small.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,049
|
I'll confess to what I thought Ty Votaw and company were up to. I thought they limited the field of each gender to 60 so that they could have both competitions on the same dates and on the same golf course by simply using different tees for men and women.
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 8,001
|
I can't see a problem with that, actually. As long as the men are competing against the men, what difference does it make? I could understand your concern if the men and women were competing against each other, but I don't think that's going to be the case.
__________________ Happiness isn't getting what you want, it's wanting what you have. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member |
. Here ya go.... Golf is in play in 2016. :-) Golf, rugby approved for Olympics in 2016, '20 - World Sports Report - CBSSports.com
__________________ ... I am not a tree, I am a tee... hit me, ah... wait a minute... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Contest Statistician |
here's my take on it. I think only amateurs should be allowed to play in the Olympics. Course it's 7 years away, but imagine the excitement if Alexis Thompson, Amanda Blumenherst, Maria Uribe, were able to compete (I realize Uribe and Blumenherst aren't amateurs anymore) for Olympic gold. For me the Olympics has always been rooting for the underdog, seeing unknowns do remarkable things under pressure. I have a feeling the public would want to see an underdog win a gold medal than Tiger Woods winning his 12,000th victory. And plus, for pro golfers, they have so many 'major' or big events, for amateurs, this would be incomparable.
|
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| olympic games, olympic golf, player limit |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |