![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | #51 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,050
| Originally Posted by Buzzer
I know you don't agree about the money but the battle over money is what has caused the problems the LPGA tour faces now, losing events.
To put it simply, CB wanted more money, a lot more money, than events were willing to pay. What would have happened if the events in question had agreed to CB's demands?
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Contest Statistician Join Date: May 2006 Location: NYC
Posts: 3,903
| Originally Posted by gxer
A lot more money then they were capable of paying. The choice was then die or pay. Since they are not able to pay they die. CB's position was then if you can't pay die, but she was not able to replace them and what she brought in all died.
It's that simple. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,050
|
Buzzer, You need to have a talk with the folks at The Jamie Farr Owens Corning Classic because it seems that they are NOT using your method, instead they are looking at, OMG, MONEY first. -------------------------------- But before Silverman starts dealing with new LPGA leadership, he plans on spending the next month budgeting what it would take to bring back the Farr. "Owens Corning and Kroger, we'll sit down with them and see what they want to do for 2010, as well as our other sponsors, and we'll determine what we think our sales will be, and then we'll be in a position to know what we can spend. That's the key." Silverman adds, "Certainly they're gonna look at the kind of attendance we had and the dollars we give to charity are very important to our sponsors, so - they're gonna look at how well was the event attended and what was the bottom line like, and then we'll move forward with the LPGA." What does Bivens' exit mean for Farr?
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #54 |
| Moderator |
They have to talk that way now that CB has destroyed the relationship, and since there is no one actually in charge they have to maintain a tough front. Who can blame them? I don't believe any tournament director will sign a new contract until the new commish takes over. The TD's will want to talk and assess what kind of relationships they might have with the LPGA AND then talk money. Makes better business sense that way. Relationships relate to trust....trust relates to finances.... Viva Annika Last edited by Buzzer; 07-19-2009 at 07:44 PM. |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 8,002
| Originally Posted by Buzzer
I agree, Buzzer. You have to have the trust that the new commissioner won't be a Bivens clone. The money will follow, but it all starts with having a positive experience while writing the check. I've bought my last three cars from the same dealership. The reason is, they've always treated me well. Their price may not have been less than other dealerships, but the service I get has always been very good.
__________________ Happiness isn't getting what you want, it's wanting what you have. |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 1,494
| Originally Posted by gxer
you forgot what was mentioned earlier in the article: "Our balancing act is, we want to have a purse high enough to attract the top players, but we also want to have a bottom line so that we can support the charities each year," said Silverman.
that's called compromise. They're not talking about scattering some crumbs for the tour, in a take it or leave it proposal. It's the middle ground, also known as "win, win".
__________________ "There's no use arguing with a fool. He only rages and scoffs, and tempers flare." |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,050
| Originally Posted by cleo
The balancing act is about money.
__________________ My "dream" girl: LPGA seasonal tour stats <=65.50 & >=270 |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Donating Member
Contests: Joint 3rd place overall winner 2010.
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,176
| Originally Posted by cleo
Hasn't the schedule been shortened enough in the future that top players can get plenty of rest while still playing all the events? I know Lorena has been taking quite a bit of time off, presumably to focus on majors, but this is not really working for her this year. I would nearly all the players to play all events (unless they dont qualify for some reason).
|
| | |
| | #59 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 1,494
| Originally Posted by ctmurray
that's a good point. In past years some of the best players could afford to miss tournaments but not anymore. It's imperative that the top LPGA players, especially the top draws play more. The US players shouldn't miss those played in the states. Knowing that all the best players will be there for the sponsers should be a strong bargining point in negotiations.
__________________ "There's no use arguing with a fool. He only rages and scoffs, and tempers flare." |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |